News
-
TJLP Statement on 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Hearings Regarding California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code in NetChoice v. Bonta, and the Mandatory Transparency Rule at Issue in X v. Bonta
Read more: TJLP Statement on 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Hearings Regarding California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code in NetChoice v. Bonta, and the Mandatory Transparency Rule at Issue in X v. BontaWASHINGTON, D.C. – Last week, the Ninth Circuit heard appeals on the legality of California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code in NetChoice v. Bonta, as well as the mandatory transparency rule at issue in X v. Bonta. In NetChoice, the Court appeared to agree with the district court that the California Age Appropriate Design Code’s requirement that companies with online platforms…
-
TJLP Statement on NetChoice Decision, Remanding Cases for Further Consideration
Read more: TJLP Statement on NetChoice Decision, Remanding Cases for Further ConsiderationSupreme Court ruled 9-0 sending cases back to Texas and Florida for further development consistent with the First Amendment WASHINGTON, DC — Today, Tech Justice Law Project (TJLP) issued the following statement regarding the Supreme Court’s decision in NetChoice v. Paxton and Moody v. NetChoice about the extent to which the government can regulate social media platforms and dictate content…
-
TJLP Statement on Murthy v. Missouri Decision, Preserving Right of Government to Communication with Social Media Platforms
Read more: TJLP Statement on Murthy v. Missouri Decision, Preserving Right of Government to Communication with Social Media PlatformsSupreme Court ruled 6-3 finding plaintiffs had no standing to sue social media companies for communicating with the government WASHINGTON, DC — Today, Tech Justice Law Project (TJLP) issued the following statement regarding the Murthy v. Missouri decision about efforts to prevent the government from communicating with social media platforms about critical issues including public health, national security,…
-
Gov. Moore to sign Maryland Kids Code internet safety bill
Read more: Gov. Moore to sign Maryland Kids Code internet safety billMaryland Kids Code, a bill that will require social media companies to do more to safeguard kids, will be signed into law by Gov. Wes Moore (D) on Thursday in Annapolis. The legislation was sponsored in the Maryland General Assembly by Del. Jared Solomon (D-Dist. 18), who represents Chevy Chase and Kensington, and Sen. Ben Kramer (D-Dist.…
-
TJLP Statement: Men Arrested in New Mexico After Preying on Children Through Meta
Read more: TJLP Statement: Men Arrested in New Mexico After Preying on Children Through MetaOn May 8, 2024, the New Mexico Attorney General announced the arrest of three men who have been charged for soliciting minors as young as 12 for sexual activity on Meta’s platforms Facebook, Instagram, and What’s App. The sting operation was part of an ongoing lawsuit commenced by the attorney general late last year alleging Meta has allowed its…
-
Podcast: What’s at Stake in Murthy v. Missouri?
Read more: Podcast: What’s at Stake in Murthy v. Missouri?TJLP Director Meetali Jain joins Tech Policy Press for a discussion of Murthy v. Missouri. Listen here:
-
Tech Justice Law Project Releases Big Tech Litigation Tracker
Read more: Tech Justice Law Project Releases Big Tech Litigation TrackerTech Justice Law Project is sharing a new resource today: a Big Tech litigation tracker that identifies significant tech accountability cases in the United States. The tracker also includes some tech accountability cases pending in courts in other countries. These cases reflect different legal theories that are being advanced in different courts: from antitrust /…
-
Tech Justice Law Project on Oral Arguments in Murthy v. Missouri
Read more: Tech Justice Law Project on Oral Arguments in Murthy v. MissouriTech Justice Law Project Director Meetali Jain released the following statement: “Today the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Murthy v Missouri, a case filed by the states of Louisiana and Missouri, along with five conservative activists, regarding alleged grievances they suffered at the hands of the federal government “coercing” social media platforms to “censor”…
-
Tech Justice Law Project Statement on Oral Arguments in Moody v. NetChoice and NetChoice v. Paxton
Read more: Tech Justice Law Project Statement on Oral Arguments in Moody v. NetChoice and NetChoice v. PaxtonAs the Supreme Court hears the most important cases on the internet, tech policy organization highlights the implications the rulings will have on our nation’s ability to reign in Big Tech Tech Justice Law Project Director Meetali Jain released the following statement: “Today’s oral arguments in Moody v. NetChoice and NetChoice v. Paxton demonstrate the complexities…
-
Broad Group of Advocates and Experts File Amicus Briefs Countering Big Tech’s Attack on Landmark California Law Protecting Kids Online
Read more: Broad Group of Advocates and Experts File Amicus Briefs Countering Big Tech’s Attack on Landmark California Law Protecting Kids OnlineGroups representing nearly 2 million educators, physicians, legal experts, tech whistleblowers, technologists, plus 21 bipartisan state Attorneys General, and the FTC file briefs urging Ninth Circuit to block Big Tech’s effort to weaponize First Amendment, overturn the nation’s first comprehensive children’s privacy law and imperil existing consumer safety laws Read the complete article on the +Accountable…